In the realm of professional management , there are cases of unethical behavior that fly under the radar , and then there are stories that challenge the core of professional ethics . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , falls squarely in the latter category — a story of suspected unethical behavior that significantly damages the reputation of a lone supervisor but throws doubt over the firm’s standards .
Despite serious allegations , Collins has remained in his role , visibly unaffected by the uproar swirling around him . How has this been allowed to persist ? What does this say about Ventia’s dedication to accountability ? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of improper behavior was marked by infractions of the organization’s employment terms , but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it evolved into a chain of concerning actions that has left coworkers disillusioned and customers perplexed.
While attending a professional growth course — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities —David Collins allegedly converted what should have been a growth-oriented experience into a series of reckless events . Sources claim he spent company-sponsored junkets seeking inappropriate relations, a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s shared values , all while his household stayed oblivious .
But the impropriety didn’t conclude additional info with these encounters . One of the gravest disclosures involves his alleged misuse of company IT systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a significant exploitation of professional tools and a destruction of integrity. His audacious engagement with Microsoft Teams to transmit inappropriate content —including emoticons signaling illicit encounters — creates a portrait of a man apathetic to the fallout. Following these digital dalliances, Collins allegedly intensified his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on several instances during working hours, despite his current marriage and her having a spouse . This transparent exploitation of company time and resources broke all norms of professionalism but resulted in personal devastation — producing a wake of personal ruin that extended past the business environment .
Why can this behavior be permitted to persist ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly broken every professional standard is still receiving a David Collins paycheck at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, originates in a worrisome failure of governance within the company . Grievances have been filed , yet Collins persists unabated.
This lack of consequence broadcasts an ominous signal : that rank and influence ventia kerikeri within the company can shield someone from repercussions . It fosters a poisonous corporate culture , discourages team members, and ultimately harms the company’s standing .